tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5065394272015487441.post4044151615274528959..comments2023-06-05T13:52:24.766+01:00Comments on Political Parry: Are You Stupid Enough to Vote No in the Referendum? Part 4Curious?http://www.blogger.com/profile/14220141774833587152noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5065394272015487441.post-23591405878755305342011-04-20T18:39:26.222+01:002011-04-20T18:39:26.222+01:00Hi Andrew, I've edited it to "votes"...Hi Andrew, I've edited it to "votes" now and apologise. However, I am pro compulsory voting. Here's hoping. <br /><br />200 is less than a third. There would be a significant reduction in liklihood of safe seats under AV. <br /><br />Assuming you are on the No camp?Curious?https://www.blogger.com/profile/14220141774833587152noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5065394272015487441.post-13222823308598642152011-04-20T16:13:56.025+01:002011-04-20T16:13:56.025+01:00"At least 50% representation of constituencie..."At least 50% representation of constituencies"<br />This is not true. The 50% requirement is only true when giving a preference for every candidates is compulsory (like Australia). Under AV as it would be implemented in the UK an MP can still get elected without a majority of voters choosing them.<br /><br />"MPs do not get safe seats, or seats for life"<br />This is also notFulbyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08048598714940249337noreply@blogger.com